The Short Version
The claim captures a real legal principle but misattributes its source. Section 2(f) of the RTI Act defines "information" broadly—including opinions, advices, and other categories—not narrowly as "pre-existing recorded material." The rule that Public Information Officers need not create, compile, or deduce information is well-established but originates from Supreme Court interpretation (notably CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay), not from the definitional text of Section 2(f) itself. By folding judicial interpretation into the statutory definition, the claim overstates what the provision actually says.