The Claim
The ethical status of trophy hunting is unrelated to its effectiveness as a biodiversity conservation tool.
Ethical judgments about trophy hunting cannot generally be separated from its conservation performance. Utilitarian and consequentialist approaches explicitly weigh biodiversity benefits and harms when assessing whether hunting is justified. Some rights-based or deontological approaches reject trophy hunting regardless of outcomes, but that limited independence does not support the blanket assertion that ethics and effectiveness are unrelated.
+ 31 more sources — see the full list on Lenz
Claim:
Trophy hunting in African countries does not contribute to wildlife conservation.
TOTAL BS
Claim:
Colonialism and neo-colonialism are not relevant factors in the scientific…
TOTAL BS
Claim:
Wealth inequality and corruption reduce the effectiveness of trophy hunting as…
HARDLY BS